The top problems with evolution explained using scientific evidence against evolution.In the creation evolution controversy, it is clear not only that the theory of evolution is wrong, the theory of evolution is false, but that the theory of evolution is a the real part.What evolutionists do not want you to know is that , something every breeder of animals or plants is aware of.
Mutations in DNA happen fairly often, but most are repaired or destroyed by mechanisms in animals and plants.All known mutations in animal and plant germ cells are neutral, harmful, or fatal. They believe that millions of beneficial mutations built every type of creature that ever existed."In humans, the effects of sweeps are expected to persist for approximately 10,000 generations or about 250,000 years." Evolutionists had identified "more than 2000 genes as potential targets of positive selection in the human genome", and they expected that "diversity patterns in about 10% of the human genome have been affected by linkage to recent sweeps." So what did they find? to breed fruit flies that develop from egg to adult 20% faster than normal. I have simplified a report by Scott Whynot, who studied 26 peer-reviewed scientific articles authored by Dr. These papers represent the major genetic findings from 21 years of the experiment.7. coli in one of the twelve isolated populations began to utilize an energy source, citrate, that they normally could not use in the presence of oxygen. coli already have the ability to transport and metabolize citrate where there is no oxygen, but they do not produce an appropriate transport protein for an environment with oxygen. coli DNA, the gene for the citrate transporter that works without oxygen is directly upstream from genes for proteins with promoters that are active in the presence of oxygen."In contrast to expectation," their test detected nothing, but they could not quite bring themselves to say it. But, as usual when breeding plants and animals, there was a down side. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. There was an insertion mutation in a gene that represses the production of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), a molecule that participates in many metabolic reactions, some affecting longevity. A replication of the region happened to put the transporter gene next to one of these promoters, so it could now be expressed in the presence of oxygen.The term macroevolution, by contrast, refers to the origin of new species and divisions of the taxonomic hierarchy above the species level, and also to the origin of complex adaptations, such as the vertebrate eye.
Macroevolution posed a problem to Darwin because his principle of descent with modification predicts gradual transitions between small-scale adaptive changes in populations and these larger-scale phenomena, yet there is little evidence for such transitions in nature.
There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world (and many grains of sand are covered with bacteria).
They exist in just about any environment: hot, cold, dry, wet, high pressure, low pressure, small groups, large colonies, isolated, much food, little food, much oxygen, no oxygen, in toxic chemicals, etc.
Only mutations in the reproductive (germ) cells of an animal or plant would be passed on.
Mutations in the eye or skin of an animal would not matter.
We tie a hammer to the wagging tail of a dog and let him wander about the work site for as long as you please, even millions of years.